planned obsolescence

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Today’s (Apparently) the Day

According to Amazon, at least: today is the day that ... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Inside Higher Ed

And just to round out what has been a completely insane week, an article reviewing ... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

On the Scholarly Press, the Manual of Style, and Intellectual Property

Stuart Sheiber posted an interesting an... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

The Future of the University Press

My friends at MPublishing have released a new issue of the ... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Talk at the Hemispheric Institute

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

To Read: How Not to Run a University Press

In the category of things that I used to post to the blog that now land on ... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Revisions: On Multimodal Scholarship

I’m finishing up the revisions on chapter 2 today, and have been thinking about the section “from text to… something more.” I’ve e... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Revisions

I’m vastly behind schedule, I’m afraid, but am at last pressing forward with revisions on Planned Obsole... read more »

Alex Juhasz's picture

“Blind” Review: You Can Ask to be Seen!

My friend and colleague, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, has written much and more on the state of academic publishing (and I recently edited a section on this in Cinema Journal) so I won’t go there again here. Kathleen’s recent book, Planned Obsolescence, is being openly peer-reviewed, on-line, at MediaCommonsPress: “open scholarship in open formats.” In this spirit of openness and full disclosure, I share my recent escapades in the dodgy realm of the “blind” review. For, “blind” reviews certainly achieve many things, including the cloaking of shoddy practices of those in control, the hiding of labor and promises behind shields of anonymity, and the use of outdated methods that have lost touch with current technologies as well as practices of publishing.... read more »

Kathleen Fitzpatrick's picture

Peer Review as Dialogue

One of the most exciting parts of Planned Obsolescence for me has of course been the open review process we’ve been conducting at MediaCommons; it’s been fantastic getting speedy, focused feedback from scholars already invested in new digital modes of communication. And NYU Press has been extremely supportive of my desire to test out that review process, to see how it might affect the ways I revise, and the ways the project is received.... read more »