Dawn of the Dead (1978): Zombies and Human Nature
by Kim Paffenroth — Iona College
September 30, 2009 – 13:19

Curator's Note
Here we have the essence of George Romero’s zombies.It comes down to two aspects: 1) zombies are merely people;2) zombie-ism – which, given proposition #1,is unadorned human nature – is always to want.
Up until the first clip (either in this film, or in its predecessor Night of the Living Dead [1968]) zombies have only been seen as relentless hunters, bent on eating living people. Now we see that they congregate in places they knew in their former lives, places and things they still desire, even after they have lost the ability to reason and choose (cf. the damned in Dante’s Inferno). Steve’s evaluation is absolutely correct – “This was an important place in their lives” – and that place is not home or work or church or theater, but a mall. The connection with hell is made explicit in the middle clip, with the movie’s tagline, “When there’s no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth.” More important, however, is Peter’s shorter explanation, “They’re us!” Zombies are the most human and mundane of monsters, with no real powers. Their monstrosity is simply that of a stripped-down human nature – appetite without reason, restraint, or purpose. The final part of the clip shows Romero’s only hint at hope or redemption (besides Night and Diary of the Dead [2007], all his zombie films end similarly), with the two escaping from the consumerist prison of never-ending, unquenchable appetites. Whether this will end in death (and the original script called for the two to commit suicide), or in some new, better life, is left entirely open. But note the relinquishing of the rifle by Peter to a zombie (with an identical gesture at the end of Day of the Dead [1985]), perhaps signifying an abandonment of violence on his part. And the choice of the two survivors – a white woman and a black man, both of whom have shown themselves to be less foolishly possessive than the other two protagonists – may leave some cause to hope their life together will be better than the racist, sexist, materialist world they have left behind.Sorry, flash is not available.
- Tags
Dawn of the Dead | - Romero |
- undead |
- zombie films |
- zombie movies |
- zombies
Feedback
No one has reviewed this post… but you need to login to submit feedback
Related Posts
- Zombies v. Humans in ‘Land of the Dead’: Fireworks and Community
- Dawn Soap: Greenwashing our way to cleaner wildlife
- Racism, Postcolonialism, and Neocolonial Zombies: Resident Evil 5
- Obama, Zombies, and Black Male Messiahs
- The Yellow Peril rises from the grave... to get your White women! Orientalist themes in zombie stories

Comments
The shift toward wrath
by Eric Hamako — University of Massachusetts Amherst
October 02, 2009 – 14:48
This Orientalist characterization of Muslims is not so different, then, from the characterization of modern zombies. The modern zombie expresses Orientalist fears of violent “Islamic” (and perhaps soon, “Confucian”) opposition to modernity and secularism.
I think zombies are
by Kim Paffenroth — Iona College
October 03, 2009 – 11:58
I think zombies are resilient as a monster and a metaphor, because they can take on new meanings and implications. So fast or angry zombies don’t really surprise or dismay me, as they do some fans.
But, I have to say, I don’t find the zombie as xenophobic (esp anti-muslim) fantasy all that convincing in most cases. At the very most, it might be a layer put on top of the basic fear and implication of zombies. Because if nothing else, zombies are by definition your neighbors and your family, and now they’re trying to kill you. And - you have to kill them, which might actually be fun in some cases (I’d note the rooftop shooting in the Dawn remake, and now Zombieland makes a whole movie of that glee at slaughtering them). Why would your zombified neighbors and family be angry at you? They’re jealous of you’re being alive, probably, and maybe they remember (or imagine) every rotten thing you did to them. Or they were angry in life, but kept it under control (don’t we all?) but now in death they have no such restraints. I see it as a much more basic, human reaction, more than a commentary on a current situation (though the current situation can easily be nodded to, as with the "Green Zone" in 28 Weeks Later, or the obvious Bush parody in Land).
Kim Paffenroth, Author of Dying to Live and other zombie fiction and nonfiction