Lacking "honesty" and "a human quality": Sorkin and the Anti-Social Network
by Pamela Ingleton — McMaster University
July 01, 2011 – 00:00
As often occurs with mass-interview publicity tours for high-profile films, in promoting The Social Network, Aaron Sorkin became quite repetitive, insisting upon two particular points with respect to the film and its (presumed) subject matter, i.e. Facebook: first, that "the Facebook movie" is, in fact, an old-fashioned tale of greed and betrayal (Sorkin and others consistently liken it to Greek or Shakespearean tragedy), and second, that the disconnect depicted in the film between the two main characters (Facebook co-founders Mark Zuckerberg, portrayed by Jesse Eisenberg, and Eduardo Saverin, played by Andrew Garfield) is indicative of the alienation and dehumanization of all social media participants. The first two to three minutes of the provided clip exemplify this second point, with Sorkin doling out what he terms an unsophisticated opinion of social media, deeming it "insincere," dishonest, inhuman and disruptive to sociality and community.
Sorkin’s comments (admittedly not those of an Internet/social media user) are representative of a more widespread tendency in assessments of, and broader arguments against, "social media" (proposed by, for example, Malcolm Gladwell and, in a piece responding to The Social Network itself, Zadie Smith), whereby these media are characterized as disingenuous spaces, lacking a rather vaguely delineated "humanity." At stake in this argument for Sorkin, perhaps, is a need to defend his more "traditional" art form, resulting in "a movie about 2.0 people made by 1.0 people" (Smith). That new guard Zuckerberg and Facebook could possibly represent the end of old guard Sorkin and Columbia Pictures is perhaps among the chief oppositions at the heart of the film.
The Social Network and Sorkin’s extratextual commentary around it (in interviews, DVD special features, award acceptance speeches, etc.) joins the lament of the social-media naysayers (whom Adam Gopnik wittily refers to as the "Better-Nevers") over an apparently novel lost humanity, as if ignorant of the comparable mournings of a hollow modernism or pastiched postmodernism, for starters. This unclear, untenable humanist framework adopted by Sorkin and Better-Never critics is an idealistic crutch, a tired, recycled critique of "man" and "technology," instead of an in-depth consideration of the specifics. In The Social Network, Facebook becomes merely the story’s macguffin. To paraphrase his own Zuckerberg iteration, if Sorkin had wanted to make a movie about Facebook, he would have made a movie about Facebook. Instead he has created a "classic" film about "humanity" for a generation he contends is losing theirs.
No one has reviewed this post… but you need to login to submit feedback
- The Comfort Women of the Digital Industries: Asian Women in David Fincher's "The Social Network"
- Aaron Sorkin's Elite Smart Girls (or Lack Thereof)
- “Sincerity” as Quality TV? Sport, Community, and the Post-Network Era
- Working Out The Kinks: Perceived Pilot Quality in Contemporary Network Comedy
- If You Write Your Social Graph, Can You Take It With You?: A Question of Social Networks, Private Property and Market Leverage