A Question of Taste: Cultural Identity on Chopped
by Jeremy Sarachan — St. John Fisher College
September 27, 2011 – 00:00
On the Food Network’s Chopped, the professional chefs/contestants are required to create an appetizer, main entrée and dessert in a fixed amount of time. The show’s hook is that for each dish, they are required to include four incongruous ingredients.
The contestant’s dishes are judged on taste, presentation and creativity. Presumably the most deserving creations win, but as television demands stories, we also are provided with a career-oriented biography for each contestant. With the introduction of this narrative, the cultural differences in cooking styles and tastes become problematic for the judges and the viewers. While the appreciation of any art form is influenced by cultural biases of what is aesthetically pleasing and technically proficient, preferences for certain dishes vary considerably with regional diets and available foods/spices.
On Chopped, there is a bias towards American cooking. In the first example seen on the video, Chef Denis is penalized primarily for making a spicy dish, despite the fact that Judge Aarón appreciates the heat and another contestant makes what Denis suggests is a more egregious error.
In the second example, the judges articulate contradictions overtly. Chef Gillian identifies herself as an “immigrant” to American cooking despite being a first-generation American, and then when she is creative with the traditions of American cooking, Judge Alex objects, suggesting that this take on American cuisine is not authentic. When Chef Gillian defends her food in the context of her memory as an American, Judge Scott attacks her for making this about her story rather than the food itself, despite the irony that the show’s editing has emphasized this narrative.
In the last example, a former member of a metal band, Chef Ric also offers his own narrative. Despite Judge Alex’s continual dislike of his dishes that she admits is “not my style of cooking at all,” Chef Ric ultimately wins the contest. Again, the narrative is emphasized, and may suggest that race can play some part in an episode’s conclusion.
Admittedly, taste and technical considerations of cooking do and should play a significant part in determining who wins, and members of all ethnicities have won Chopped. But, on numerous occasions, in order to fulfill the expectations of reality television, narrative (and when appropriate, ethnic narrative) is used to create tension, suggesting a prejudice against ethnic cooking, when food should more effectively function as a common language.
No one has reviewed this post… but you need to login to submit feedback
- Re-visioning Arab Identity in US Popular Culture
- A Taste for Reality
- In Good Taste?: The BET Awards and the Burden of Representation
- Yours or Ours? The L Word’s OurChart, Internet Social Networking, and Identity
- If This is OurChart Then Where is MyChart?: Selective Lesbian Identities on The L Word’s Social Networking Site