Regarding Star Trek IV: A Very Brief Cultural History of Whale Song

Curator's Note

Early in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (Leonard Nimoy, 1986), in which a space probe threatens to annihilate the earth unless it gets a response to its cryptic, ocean-directed signal, Kirk instructs Uhura to manipulate a recording of the signal. Modifying it to account for “density, temperature, and salinity factors,” Uhura reveals what the signal, in Kirk’s words, “would sound like underwater.” For many viewers in 1986, the resultant “mroo”s would have been instantly recognizable: humpback whale song—sounds that had proliferated in pop culture for most of two decades. The sonic history of whale song begins with the 1970 LP Songs of the Humpback Whale, a collection of hydrophone recordings released by marine biologist Roger Payne, who furnished Nimoy with the recordings used in the film. The same year heard Alan Hovhaness’s And God Created Great Whales and Judy Collins’s “Farewell to Tarwathie,” both of which featured humpback songs, as well as Pete Seeger’s anti-whaling plaint “The Song of the World’s Last Whale.” In 1977 NASA launched whale songs into deep space on its Voyager Golden Record; the following year, Kate Bush hit #1 in Japan with “Moving,” which opened with a twenty-second whale aria. The high-water mark for whale song was arguably the January 1979 issue of National Geographic, which delivered to millions of readers a flexi disc of humpback phonations set to an explanatory narration by Payne. Bookending this history was Paul Winter’s 1987 Grammy-nominated New Age record Whales Alive, coproduced by Payne and featuring prose and poetry readings by Nimoy, whose presence on the record reinforced Star Trek IV’s place in this lineage. In using whale songs to motivate its save-the-whales time-travel narrative, Star Trek IV deploys them in a manner consistent with the discourse that surrounded them from start. Throughout the seventies, whale songs were pivotal in spreading the idea that cetaceans were supremely benevolent and intelligent beings threatened by “human arrogance” (to quote Spock) before the natural world—arrogance that would drive not only whales but eventually humankind itself to extinction. In having the crew return to 1986 San Francisco to transport a pair of humpbacks to the twenty-third century, where they’re extinct, to sing to the probe and save the planet, Star Trek IV literalizes Seeger’s earlier call to conscience: “If we can save our singers in the sea, perhaps there’s a chance to save you and me.”

Comments

Nathanael Bassett's picture

Whales

Hi Jon, thanks for the post! I always enjoyed Spock’s line here about “only human arrogance would assume the message must be meant for man.” Recently I’ve been reading Other Minds, by Peter Godfrey-Smith, which talks about the fuzzy areas between consciousness/non-consciousness (something also explored in the recent show Westworld). There seems to be a tentacle turn of sorts in theory, from Flusser’s Vampyroteuthis infernalis, to Harraway’s Staying With the Trouble. When it comes to nonhuman intelligence, people seem to be talking about cephalopods, rather than cetacea. Have you noticed this shift and if so what do you attribute it to?

Re: WHALES

Thanks for your response! That’s a great question. However, I actually don’t think there’s been a marked shift from cetaceans to cephalopods in humanist thought. Consideration of marine life in philosophy and critical theory has been pretty unusual until recently. Rather, the shift seems to have been from mammals to non-mammals—or perhaps more broadly from vertebrates to invertebrates. Without getting into specific arguments, this may have to do a general intellectual acceptance of the complexity of mammalian life and a consequent interest in our affinities and differences with the radically other, whether slime molds (Steven Shaviro) or cephalopods (Flusser, Haraway, Godfrey-Smith)—a project that has, I think, great ethical import as people grapple with climate change and the prospect of mass extinction.

Nathanael Bassett's picture

great response, thanks! i

great response, thanks! i think you’re right that non-mammals/invertebrates are really what people are thinking about, and that is a pretty neat explanation.

Feedback

No one has reviewed this post… but you need to login to submit feedback