Table of Contents

Comment Icon0 National Endowment for the Arts. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. National Endowment for the Arts, 2004. http://www.nea.gov/pub/ReadingAtRisk.pdf.

Comment Icon0 —. Reading on the Rise: A New Chapter in American Literacy. National Endowment for the Arts, 2009. http://www.nea.gov/research/ReadingonRise.pdf.

Comment Icon0 —. To Read or Not To Read: A Question of National Consequence. National Endowment for the Arts, 2007. http://www.nea.gov/research/ToRead.pdf.

Comment Icon0 Nelson, T. H. “Complex Information Processing: A File Structure for the Complex, the Changing, and the Indeterminate.” Association for Computing Machinery: Proceedings of the 1965 20th National Conference. New York: ACM Press, 1965. 84-100.

Comment Icon0 Neubauer, Bruce J., and Gene A. Brewer. “Virtual Scholarly Collaboration: A Case Study.” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 19.4 (2004): 92-98.

Comment Icon0 No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2008. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/pub142.pdf.

Comment Icon0 Nunberg, Geoffrey. “The Places of Books in the Age of Electronic Reproduction.” Representations 42 (1993): 13-37.

Comment Icon0 O’Donnell, James. “The Pragmatics of the New: Trithemius, McLuhan, Cassiodorus.” The Future of the Book. Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 37-62.

Comment Icon0 “Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing.” Penn State University Libraries. http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/odsp.html.

Comment Icon0 Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 2002.

Comment Icon0 “Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting.” Open Archives Initiative. http://www.openarchives.org/pmh/.

Comment Icon0 “Open Media Commons.” Open Media Commons. http://openmediacommons.org/.

Comment Icon0 Owens, Howard. “What We’ve Learned from Blogs – How to Grow Audience.” Media Blog. 9 Jul 2007. http://www.howardowens.com/2007/what-weve-learnd-from-blogs-how-to-grow-audience/.

Comment Icon0 Paskin, Norman. “Digital Object Identifier (DOI) System.” Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Third Edition. Taylor & Francis, 2010.

Comment Icon0 Peters, Douglas P., and Stephen J. Ceci. “Peer Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again.” Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004. 191-214.

Comment Icon0 “Philica FAQs.” Philica. http://philica.com/faq.php.

Comment Icon0 Pliny. http://pliny.cch.kcl.ac.uk/index.html.

Comment Icon0 Poe, Marshall. “The Hive.” The Atlantic Sep 2006. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200609/wikipedia.

Comment Icon0 “Portico’s Archival Approach.” Portico. http://portico.org/about/approach.html.

Comment Icon0 Pöschl, Ulrich. “Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance.” Learned Publishing 17.2 (2004): 105-113.

Comment Icon0 Poster, Mark. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

Comment Icon0 —. What’s the Matter with the Internet? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

Comment Icon0 Pranzatelli, Robert. “A Brief History of Yale University Press.” Yale University Press. http://yalepress.yale.edu/yupbooks/centennial/briefhistory.asp.

Comment Icon0 Pressman, Jessica. “Vectors: Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular.” Transliteracies Project: Research in the Technological, Social, and Cultural Practices of Online Reading. http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/post/research-project/research-clearinghouse-individual/research-reports/vectors-journal-of-culture-and-technology-in-a-dynamic-vernacular.

Comment Icon0 Price, Leah. “Reading: The State of the Discipline.” Book History 7 (2004): 303-320.

Comment Icon0 “Quick Facts.” Handle System 29 Apr 2009. 26 Jul 2009 http://handle.net/factsheet.html.

Comment Icon0 Quinet, Raphæl. “Social Experiment on Slashdot Moderation.” Advogato. 24 Jan 2000. http://www.advogato.org/article/27.html.

Comment Icon0 Radway, Janice. “Research Universities, Periodical Publication, and the Circulation of Professional Expertise: On the Significance of Middlebrow Authority.” Critical Inquiry 31.1 (2004): 203-228.

Comment Icon0 Raggett, Dave. “A History of HTML.” 1998. http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/book4/ch02.html.

Comment Icon0 Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996.

Comment Icon0 Redden, Elizabeth. “Unread Monographs, Uninspired Undergrads.” Inside Higher Ed. 18 Mar 2009. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/03/18/production.

Comment Icon0 Regalado, Mariana. “Research Authority in the Age of Google: Equilibrium Sought.” Library Philosophy and Practice (2007). http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/regalado.htm.

Comment Icon0 Renear, Allen H. “Text Encoding.” A Companion to Digital Humanities. Ed. Raymond Siemens, Susan Schreibman, & John Unsworth. Oxford: Black, 2004. 218-239.

Comment Icon0 Rennie, Drummond. “Commentary on Fabiato, A., ‘Anonymity of Reviewers’.” Cardiovascular Research 28 (1994): 1142-1143.

Comment Icon0 —. “Editorial Peer Review: Its Development and Rationale.” Peer Review in Health Sciences. Ed. Fiona Godlee & Tom Jefferson. London: BMJ Books, 2003. 1-13.

Comment Icon0 Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. Modern Language Association of America, 2006. http://www.mla.org/pdf/task_force_tenure_promo.pdf.

Comment Icon0 Rheingold, Howard. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.

Comment Icon0 Rich, Motoko. “Publishers Announce Staff Cuts.” The New York Times 4 Dec 2008: B1.

Comment Icon0 Rosenblatt, Bill. “The Digital Object Identifier: Solving the Dilemma of Copyright Protection Online.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 3.2 (1997). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0003.204.

Comment Icon0 Roy, Rustum, and James R. Ashburn. “The perils of peer review.” Nature 414.6862 (2001): 393-394.

Comment Icon0 Ruecker, Stan, and Alan Galey. “Design as a Hermeneutic Process: Thinking Through Making from Book History to Critical Design.” Digital Humanities 2009. College Park, Maryland, 2009. 240-41.

Comment Icon0 Saint-Amour, Paul K. The Copywrights: Intellectual Property and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2003.

Comment Icon0 Schiff, Stacy. “Know It All.” The New Yorker 31 Jul 2006. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/07/31/060731fa_fact.

Comment Icon0 Schneider, Karen G. “Lots of Librarians Can Keep Stuff Safe: Libraries Are Able to Safeguard Content with LOCKSS, Open Source Digital Preservation Software.” Library Journal 132.13 (2007): 30-31.

Comment Icon0 Sconce, Jeffrey. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.

Comment Icon0 SEASR. http://seasr.org/.

Comment Icon0 Seglen, Per O. “Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.” British Journal of Medicine 314 (1997): 497.

Comment Icon0 Shatz, David. Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.

Comment Icon0 Shirky, Clay. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: The Penguin Press, 2008.

Comment Icon0 —. “Ontology is Overrated.” Clay Shirky’s Writings About the Internet. 2005. http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.

Comment Icon0 Siemens, Ray, John Unsworth, and Susan Schreibman. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/.

Comment Icon0 Silvia, Paul J. How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007.

Comment Icon0 Simone, Raffaelle. “The Body of the Text.” The Future of the Book. Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 239-251.

Comment Icon0 “Skin Footnotes.” Shelley Jackson’s Ineradicable Stain. http://www.ineradicablestain.com/footnotes.html.

Comment Icon0 Smith, Alexandra. “Scientists concerned over research assessment changes.” The Guardian 7 Dec 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/dec/07/highereducation.researchassessmentexercise.

Comment Icon0 Smith, Richard. “Commentary: The power of the unrelenting impact factor–Is it a force for good or harm?.” International Journal of Epidemiology 35.5 (2006): 1129-1130.

Comment Icon0 Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., and Lou Burnard, eds. TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. The TEI Consortium, 2009.

Comment Icon0 Spier, Ray. “The History of the Peer-Review Process.” TRENDS in Biotechnology 20.8 (2002): 357-358.

Comment Icon0 Stallings, Ariel Meadow. “Matthew Baldwin: Writer, Blogger, Pretty Okay Guy.” Microspotting 2008. http://www.microspotting.com/2008/07/matthew-baldwin-defective-yeti.

Comment Icon0 Stallybrass, Peter. “Books and Scrolls: Navigating the Bible.” Books and Readers in Early Modern England. Ed. Jennifer Andersen & Elizabeth Sauer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002. 42-79.

Comment Icon0 —. “Little Jobs: Broadsides and the Printing Revolution.” Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies After Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. Ed. Sabrina A Baron, Eric N Lindquist, & Eleanor F Shevlin. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007. 315-41.

Comment Icon0 —. “Textual Studies and the Book.” Conference presentation. Modern Language Association. Philadelphia. December 2006.

Comment Icon0 Stein, Bob. “Jaron Lanier’s Essay on ‘The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism’.” if:book 8 Aug 2006. http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2006/08/jaron_laniers_essay_on_digital.html.

Comment Icon0 Stephens, Mitchell. “Holy of Holies: On the Constituents of Emptiness.” Dec 2006. http://www.futureofthebook.org/mitchellstephens/holyofholies/.

Comment Icon0 Sun, Sam, Larry Lannom, and Brian Boesch. “RFC 3650 Handle System Overview.” Handle System Nov 2003. http://www.handle.net/rfc/rfc3650.html.

Comment Icon0 Sunstein, Cass R. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Comment Icon0 Sutherland, Meghan. “Rigor/Mortis: The Industrial Life of Style in American Zombie Cinema.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 48.2 (2007): 64-78.

Comment Icon0 Sutor, Bob. “Open Source vs. Open Standards.” Bob Sutor. http://www.sutor.com/newsite/drupal/osvsos.

Comment Icon0 Swales, John, and Christine B Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.

bibliography, n-s

Comments

0 Comments on the whole page

0 Comments on paragraph 1

0 Comments on paragraph 2

0 Comments on paragraph 3

0 Comments on paragraph 4

0 Comments on paragraph 5

0 Comments on paragraph 6

0 Comments on paragraph 7

0 Comments on paragraph 8

0 Comments on paragraph 9

0 Comments on paragraph 10

0 Comments on paragraph 11

0 Comments on paragraph 12

0 Comments on paragraph 13

0 Comments on paragraph 14

0 Comments on paragraph 15

0 Comments on paragraph 16

0 Comments on paragraph 17

0 Comments on paragraph 18

0 Comments on paragraph 19

0 Comments on paragraph 20

0 Comments on paragraph 21

0 Comments on paragraph 22

0 Comments on paragraph 23

0 Comments on paragraph 24

0 Comments on paragraph 25

0 Comments on paragraph 26

0 Comments on paragraph 27

0 Comments on paragraph 28

0 Comments on paragraph 29

0 Comments on paragraph 30

0 Comments on paragraph 31

0 Comments on paragraph 32

0 Comments on paragraph 33

0 Comments on paragraph 34

0 Comments on paragraph 35

0 Comments on paragraph 36

0 Comments on paragraph 37

0 Comments on paragraph 38

0 Comments on paragraph 39

0 Comments on paragraph 40

0 Comments on paragraph 41

0 Comments on paragraph 42

0 Comments on paragraph 43

0 Comments on paragraph 44

0 Comments on paragraph 45

0 Comments on paragraph 46

0 Comments on paragraph 47

0 Comments on paragraph 48

0 Comments on paragraph 49

0 Comments on paragraph 50

0 Comments on paragraph 51

0 Comments on paragraph 52

0 Comments on paragraph 53

0 Comments on paragraph 54

0 Comments on paragraph 55

0 Comments on paragraph 56

0 Comments on paragraph 57

0 Comments on paragraph 58

0 Comments on paragraph 59

0 Comments on paragraph 60

0 Comments on paragraph 61

0 Comments on paragraph 62

0 Comments on paragraph 63

0 Comments on paragraph 64

0 Comments on paragraph 65

0 Comments on paragraph 66

0 Comments on paragraph 67

0 Comments on paragraph 68

0 Comments on paragraph 69

Leave a Comment